The real coup in science can be to understand the rules of the particular world you’re studying, and figure out how to ask questions of it on its own terms.
Well written! Thanks for revising this and then sharing. I thought the point of 'Spandrels' was that not *all* traits are adaptive – in that spirit, the spandrels, when considered as the equivalent of a trait, are not, even if their ornateness would make us think otherwise. I don't think Gould & Lewontin were arguing the pointy beak is not an adaptation.
Well written! Thanks for revising this and then sharing. I thought the point of 'Spandrels' was that not *all* traits are adaptive – in that spirit, the spandrels, when considered as the equivalent of a trait, are not, even if their ornateness would make us think otherwise. I don't think Gould & Lewontin were arguing the pointy beak is not an adaptation.